As much as I enjoy these articles and for AMD to write more light technical articles, it really feels constrained, even strained, to be unable to cite the equivalent terms from the precursor here (NVIDIA). Another batch of jargon for very similar architectures and programming models... HIP and ROCm have actually made amazing strides in making CUDA developers' porting work easy, and I know playing catchup to a (monopolist) moving target you have no power over is bad... but I feel this is part of the thousand paper cuts.