Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Like the fact that supposedly the wealthy won’t survive the AI-pocolypse because the people will outnumber them and rise up or something.

This is literally the opposite of what the article says.



This is a moot point though. Before all the jobs are replaced in 2036, shouldn't we see data centres burning? Revolutions tend to succeed with only 1% of population taking part. I think it's probably that this revolution will ultimately fail for various reasons, but still it's a valid scenario, which at the very least should be mentioned.


but no one in HN reads the article and the 1/9/90 rule means that comments like the above will always be impactful




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: