Why is it anti-human to suggest that an underwater basket weaver should not make the same amount of money as a neurosurgeon?
It is funny when such claims are put with an aura of harsh, but brilliant insight, yet they are nothing more than expression of ideology.
Because that's a hyperbolic exaggeration to make you feel fine about ignoring the plight of others?
The machine should serve society, society shouldn't serve the machine. Unfortunately, what we have is far closer to the latter.
Why is it anti-human to suggest that an underwater basket weaver should not make the same amount of money as a neurosurgeon?